British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas and Responsible for Housing
News | The Premier Online | Ministries & Organizations | Job Opportunities | Main Index

MINFILE Home page  ARIS Home page  MINFILE Search page  Property File Search
Help Help
File Created: 30-Mar-2015 by Garry J. Payie (GJP)
Last Edit:  13-Apr-2015 by Garry J. Payie (GJP)

Summary Help Help

NMI
Name TRI LAKES, SELENA, DARLENE Mining Division Skeena
BCGS Map 104B078
Status Showing NTS Map 104B09W
Latitude 056º 43' 30'' UTM 09 (NAD 83)
Longitude 130º 24' 31'' Northing 6287650
Easting 413800
Commodities Copper Deposit Types I06 : Cu+/-Ag quartz veins
I01 : Au-quartz veins
Tectonic Belt Intermontane Terrane Overlap Assemblage
Capsule Geology

The Tri Lakes property was found to be underlain mainly by argillite/siltstone and greywacke/sandstone with minor lenses of conglomerate. All of these units were believed by explorations in 1990 to belong to the Middle Jurassic Salmon River Formation (Hazelton Group) but the most recent compilation shows the area to be (in general) underlain by the Middle to Upper Jurassic Bowser Lake Group (Open File 2005-5).

The 1990 exploration program by Canadian Eagle Exploration Ltd on the Tri Lakes project consisted of reconnaissance geological mapping and prospecting in conjunction with the collection of 23 rock, 334 soil, and 20 stream sediment samples for geochemical analysis.

Areas of blow-out quartz veining were found throughout the property. The veins are milky white coloured bull quartz, ranging in width from a few millimetres to 3 metres. This system occurs in a zone that is 25 to 75 metres wide and 400 metres long. Very minor limonite staining with rare specks of pyrite and one small speck of malachite were observed.

Gold results from the initial samples are low with the exception of soil samples on one contour line. Assays ranged from 20 to 85 parts per billion over a 300 metres distance along the line (Assessment Report 21175). Limited follow up consisting of mapping and additional contour soil sampling in the area of the anomalous soils was carried out. The mapping did not reveal any obvious source for the anomalies and results from the additional contour soil lines above and below the anomalous area were low.

Bibliography
EMPR ASS RPT *21175
EMPR BULL 63
EMPR MAP 65 (1989)
EMPR OF 1989-10; 1992-1; 1992-3; 1994-1; 1998-8-I, pp. 1-20; 1998-10; 1999-2; 1999-14; 2005-5
EMPR P 1991-4, pp. 116-118
GSC BULL 540
GSC MAP 9-1957; 1418A, 1868A
GSC P 89-1E, pp. 145-154

COPYRIGHT | DISCLAIMER | PRIVACY | ACCESSIBILITY