British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas and Responsible for Housing
News | The Premier Online | Ministries & Organizations | Job Opportunities | Main Index

MINFILE Home page  ARIS Home page  MINFILE Search page  Property File Search
Help Help
File Created: 24-Jul-1985 by BC Geological Survey (BCGS)
Last Edit:  23-Mar-2022 by Nicole Barlow (NB)

Summary Help Help

NMI 093N6 Cr2
Name HOGEM RANGES, PT Mining Division Omineca
BCGS Map 093N023
Status Showing NTS Map 093N06W
Latitude 055º 15' 24'' UTM 10 (NAD 83)
Longitude 125º 28' 48'' Northing 6126157
Easting 342390
Commodities Chromium, Nickel Deposit Types M03 : Podiform chromite
Tectonic Belt Intermontane Terrane Cache Creek
Capsule Geology

The Hogem Ranges occurrence is situated at the south end of the Mitchell Range, approximately 40 kilometres southeast of Takla Landing. It is one of numerous small chromite occurrences located in the range (see 093N 033, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40).

The occurrences comprise small disseminated, aggregate (greater than 75 per cent) and massive chromite nodules and layers which are hosted by allochthonous, serpentinized harzburgite, formerly assigned to the Middle Permian to Late Triassic Trembleur intrusions, and now termed Mississippian to Triassic Oceanic Ultramafites. The intrusion is bound by north-northeast and east-trending lineaments and is both surrounded by, and hosts xenoliths of sedimentary rocks assigned to the Carboniferous to Jurassic Cache Creek Complex. For additional regional geology details, please refer to the Simpson, Bob and Irish occurrences (093N 033, 34, 35).

No recent information concerning this occurrence is available, but it was likely mapped by Whittaker as one of the seventeen occurrences he located in the area (Fieldwork 1982-1, Table 1, Figure 1).

Work History

Chromite was identified in the area by at least the early 1940s. Little or no other work is reported until at least the 1980s.

In 2004, the area was staked as the IR, PT, PD and OS claims by Ursula G. Mowat and a program of rock and silt sampling and geological mapping was completed. Sampling was reported to be disappointing in that no chromite was located and the rock samples that were analyzed contained no significant values in platinum group elements. Elevated nickel values were encountered in the ultramafics, especially on the IR and PD claims. Rock samples (B158738 and B158742) from the PT claim yielded up to 0.174 per cent nickel and 0.122 per cent chromium (Assessment Report 27857).

In 2009, FPX Nickel Corp. prospected and sampled the area as the Mesa 8-14 claims. Seven rock samples taken from the east-facing valley to the east of the occurrence yielded from 0.089 to 0.167 per cent nickel and up to 0.120 per cent chromium (Assessment Report 31553).

Bibliography
EMPR ASS RPT *27857, 31553
EMPR FIELDWORK 1982-1, pp. 234-243
EMPR Unpublished Chromite Bulletin, Stevenson, J.S. (1941)
EMPR OF 2000-19
EMPR PF (Whittaker, P. (1983): Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis; "Chromite in
Alpine Type Peridotites", Carleton University, 339 pp. (refer to
093N General File))
GSC MAP *844A; 907A; 971A; 1008A; 1424A
GSC MEM 252, pp. 135,189
GSC OF 3071
GSC P 42-7; 45-6; 82-1A, pp. 239-245
Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 22, Pt. 1, Feb.1984
Hanson, J., Houle, J. (2021-01-21): Technical Report for the Nickel Project

COPYRIGHT | DISCLAIMER | PRIVACY | ACCESSIBILITY